STATUS
-1. Done
-2. Trivial, can do if want
-3. Already done; needs some reworking
-4. I tried; I can always try again!
-5. a. done
+1. Trivial, can do if want
+2. Already done; needs some reworking
+3. I tried; I can always try again!
+4. a. done
b. Brilliant!
c. impossible
-6.
+5.
Dear Evan and list,
Constructive Criticism for Viking
---------------------------------
- 1. Use autoconf/automake. Currently, if things (e.g. gtk, glib) are missing,
- the build simply fails, sometimes quite spectacularly. This will also
- bring in all sorts of handy niceties such as an "install" make target,
- etc.
-
- 2. The top-level map directories appear to have the form "tZsXXzYY". Does tZ
+ 1. The top-level map directories appear to have the form "tZsXXzYY". Does tZ
stand for "type Z" where type is terraserver, google, expedia, etc.? If
so, I suggest using a word rather than a number for greater transparency.
- 3. There ought to be a way to re-download map tiles, in case you mess with
+ 2. There ought to be a way to re-download map tiles, in case you mess with
the files on disk like I did and download some aerial photos into the
topo area.
- 4. Panning (which is scads faster than v0.0.9, BTW) leaves screen junk in the
+ 3. Panning (which is scads faster than v0.0.9, BTW) leaves screen junk in the
panned-into region. Perhaps this area could be filled in with a solid
color (say, a light steel gray?) until the new image can be drawn?
I do really like that panning is lightning-fast, and drawing new data is
deferred until I stop dragging.
- 5. I like that downloading maps doesn't bring up a new window anymore.
+ 4. I like that downloading maps doesn't bring up a new window anymore.
However, there needs to be more feedback on what is going on. I'd like to
see the following:
c. Map tiles are drawn as soon as they are available. Currently, new tiles
aren't drawn in until another redraw event comes in.
- 6. Changing zoom level to a large scale (e.g. zoom out 64x) is slow, esp. if
+ 5. Changing zoom level to a large scale (e.g. zoom out 64x) is slow, esp. if
you only use the 4x4 meter resolution topos, as I do. This slowness is
fine, but I think there ought to be an indicator that Viking is thinking
-- the watch cursor, perhaps. I don't think a full-blown percentage bar
window is necessary.
- 7. Resizes to the layer info panel (or, the window config in general) should
+ 6. Resizes to the layer info panel (or, the window config in general) should
stored in the Viking file so they're persistent across sessions.
- 8. It should be clearer which tool is active. Each tool should have its own
+ 7. It should be clearer which tool is active. Each tool should have its own
cursor.
- 9. Visibility of the start/end trackpoints of a track should be controllable
+ 8. Visibility of the start/end trackpoints of a track should be controllable
independently of the visibility of interior points. I think that it would
also be handy if, near the start/end trackpoints, "Foobar start" and
"foobar end" could be drawn, since otherwise I forget the tracks' names
and I don't remember which little symbol is the end and which is the
beginning.
-10. There should be a concept of a "current track". The current track should
+ 9. There should be a concept of a "current track". The current track should
be drawn in a different color, and it should be highlighted in the list in
the same color. The "Create Track" tool should extend the current track by
adding on to the end point.
restarting the program. Perhaps separate Begin Track and Extend Track
tools would be a good idea?
-11. Track colors are kind of strange under "Track drawing mode: draw by
+10. Track colors are kind of strange under "Track drawing mode: draw by
track". Here are some suggestions:
a. Once a track is assigned a color, it should never change except by the
d. A path's color should appear in its list entry, too. Perhaps a small
square by the name?
-12. I might further increase the contrast of the current trackpoint (selected
+11. I might further increase the contrast of the current trackpoint (selected
with the edit trackpoint tool). Perhaps rather than changing its size,
draw a big bold crosshair centered on it?
-13. Tracks names should permit mixed-case.
+12. Tracks names should permit mixed-case.
-14. IMO, being able to customize the background color is an unnecessary
+13. IMO, being able to customize the background color is an unnecessary
feature, and should be removed to ease maintenance.
-15. I would rename the menu item "Zoom To..." to "Zoom to Custom..." and the
+14. I would rename the menu item "Zoom To..." to "Zoom to Custom..." and the
"Zoom" submenu to "Zoom To".
-16. Type size in the layer list should be configurable.
+15. Type size in the layer list should be configurable.
-17. Perhaps dragging with the middle button should pan. I think this would
+16. Perhaps dragging with the middle button should pan. I think this would
complement well the existing center at location of middle click.
-18. Deleting something big, like a track or a layer, should have a
+17. Deleting something big, like a track or a layer, should have a
confirmation box.
-19. It would be nice to have more information in the interface about which
+18. It would be nice to have more information in the interface about which
maps will be used depending on the "zoom level" of a map layer. For
example, in a Terraserver topo layer, I had to discover by trial and
error that <= 8x means "use 24,000:1 topo maps" and >= 16x means "use
100,000:1 topo maps".
-20. Consider an XML file format rather than the existing ad-hoc one.
+19. Consider an XML file format rather than the existing ad-hoc one.
-21. The ability to rotate and move waypoint text would be fabulous.
+20. The ability to rotate and move waypoint text would be fabulous.
-22. When moving waypoints, it would be great if a greyed copy of the waypoint
+21. When moving waypoints, it would be great if a greyed copy of the waypoint
text and dot moved with the mouse.
-23. I'd like the ability to customize the waypoint dot symbol. Personally, I'd
+22. I'd like the ability to customize the waypoint dot symbol. Personally, I'd
prefer an X to the dot.